Law Firms
Private AI that respects privilege
Personal chatbots create difficult questions for client matters. A Private GPT deployment gives the firm a sanctioned drafting and retrieval path with approved sources, configured matter access, and documented provider handling.
Privilege and public AI do not coexist
Uploading a settlement agreement to a consumer chatbot is an uncontrolled disclosure. Your associates are doing it anyway unless you give them a sanctioned alternative.
Institutional knowledge is trapped in matters
Your firm has answered most questions before. The answer lives in a closed matter nobody remembers. A private assistant that searches firm knowledge changes the economics of every new matter.
Drafting eats associate hours
First drafts of routine correspondence, engagement letters, and summaries are exactly what AI does well, when it knows your templates and your matter context.
What your team can use it for
- Summarize deposition transcripts and long agreements with page citations
- Draft routine correspondence and engagement letters from firm templates
- Search prior matters and firm knowledge with role based access intact
- Compare contract versions and flag changed clauses
- Prepare matter status summaries for client updates
- Answer policy and procedure questions for staff with source references
Same managed platform, scoped to your systems and controls. See how deployment works or review pricing factors.
Questions legal teams ask
How does a private GPT protect privileged material?
The deployment can place approved indexes in a dedicated environment, restrict retrieval by configured matter or role, and document the model endpoint, provider terms, logging, and administrator access. Those controls support a firm's process but do not replace its legal or ethical review.
Can access be restricted by matter or practice group?
Role based retrieval can be configured around practice groups, matter teams, and approved sources. The exact permission mapping and exception process are reviewed during deployment.
Will attorneys actually use it?
It uses the familiar chat pattern teams already know, while grounding answers in your approved templates, matters, and house style. We plan onboarding around the workflows your attorneys choose to validate.
See it running on legal work
Book a meeting to review one real workflow, the approved information it needs, and the access, integration, support, timeline, and pricing scope for your firm.