Private GPT

· 7 min read

Azure OpenAI vs Private GPT

Compare Azure OpenAI model access with a managed private GPT application, including data flow, identity, retrieval, logging, support, and ownership.

Azure OpenAI and a private GPT describe different layers. Azure OpenAI provides managed model access through Azure. A private GPT adds the application your team uses: identity, approved retrieval, access rules, logging, a branded interface, and an operating owner. The practical decision is whether your team will build and run that product layer or scope it as a managed deployment.

What Azure OpenAI actually gives you

Azure OpenAI provides model endpoints and Azure controls, not a finished employee application. Your architecture still has to define identity, source permissions, retrieval, application logs, retention, monitoring, user experience, and support. Verify the current Microsoft terms and the exact data path for the services you configure rather than treating the Azure label as the whole privacy design.

What a private GPT adds on top

A private GPT is the product layer. It takes model access, whether from Azure OpenAI or other providers, and turns it into something your team opens and uses on day one.

  • A branded chat interface on your own domain instead of a raw API
  • Document connection and indexing, so the assistant answers from your files with sources
  • Role based access that mirrors your org chart, so people only see what they are cleared to see
  • Memory across conversations, clients, and projects instead of a stateless endpoint
  • Access to many models through one interface, not a single vendor's lineup
  • Audit trails and a managed environment someone else keeps running

The build you are signing up for with raw Azure OpenAI

Choosing Azure OpenAI alone means committing to build and maintain the application around it: the front end, document pipeline, authentication and permissions, logging, and ongoing upkeep. For a company with a platform engineering team and time, that can be a reasonable path. Other teams may prefer to assign those responsibilities through a managed scope.

Cost and time to value

With raw Azure OpenAI, account for model usage and the engineering work to build and operate the application. With a managed private GPT, the proposal reflects the environment, data connections, access controls, integrations, and ongoing support in scope. You are comparing an internal build with a managed operating model, not two equivalent subscriptions.

Which one is right for you

Pick raw Azure OpenAI if you have the engineering team to build and own an internal application and you want maximum control over every layer. Pick a managed private GPT if you want a private, in-your-cloud deployment without running the software project yourself. See how deployment works or book a meeting to discuss your specific setup and pricing scope.

Ready to own your AI?

Book a meeting to see a live private deployment and talk through your team, data sources, requirements, and pricing.

Book a meeting